in December Of 1863 Young David Is Taken Prisoner At A Union Check Point South Of Little Rock, Arkansas. Some Questionable Papers Were Found On His Person And The Sergeant Felt That He Should Be Held Until Someone Could ' />It's just somebody's personal website. I suspect the information on the personal website came from there .. Truthanado (talk) 0. April 2. 00. 8 (UTC)GA failure. I just think that what needs to be done to bring it to GA standard will take a while, certainly more than seven days. I would be very pleased to see the article eventually renominated, if the points below can be addressed.

The main problem I had is that there are so many loose ends that it seems as though only about half of the article has been written. There is a whole lot of stuff missing that we (the readers) needs to know if we are to make proper sense of this story. The following is a list, not necessarily exhaustive, of questions that need attention: -What was the nature of the business that Dodd's father sent him to Little Rock for? This has been added to the article. Who was Mary Dodge - an old or a new acquaintance?
Unknown .. Did he explain how he came to be carrying messages in morse code about Union troop strengths. Did he admit they were his and that he'd sent them, or claim they were planted, or what? Was he legally represented?
David Owen Dodd was born at Victoria. Dodd trial materials. Dodd window was unveiled at the Museum of the Confederacy in. David Owen Dodd (1846-1864) The Trial. David Owen Dodd (November 10, 1846. Dodd's trial began in Little Rock by a military tribunal of six Union officers. Dodd, David Owen ALTERNATIVE NAMES Dodd. Stream I Am Here online in english in QHD 21:9. David Owen Dodd collection, 1857-1970.
This has been added to the article. How, if at all, did Dodd explain the Derringer found on him? Was this held against him, or was it acceptable - there was a war going on, after all. What was the significance of the parcel found ?
Was his father, who had sent him to Little Rock in the first place, questioned? Who were the character witnesses that testified for him? That's enough for the moment. Please let me know if anything is not clear.
Brianboulton (talk) 2. March 2. 00. 8 (UTC)(This is being posted on the article's talk page as well as on the reviewer's talk page.) As the one who started this article, I appreciate your taking the time to review it. I was flattered that the article was nominated for GA status.
I will try to address your questions, although it is difficult to find verifiablesources for the level of detail you are asking about. Having been involved in some GA reviews previously, I would be curious how you rate the article using the six criteria in Wikipedia: Good article criteria. Truthanado (talk) 0. March 2. 00. 8 (UTC)Thank you for your comment, and I apologise for not including the following criteria list in my original review. Well- written, etc: Marginal fail. It's not badly written but the lead is not in accordance with Mo. S guidelines. Verifiable: Pass.
Breadth of coverage etc: Fail. This is the main area of concern - as indicated, too much is presently left out of the story. Neutral: Pass. Stable: Pass.
Images: So- so. As you have the only confirmed photograph of Dodd there probably aren't any other specific images you could use, but you could consider brightening the article with some background stuff (Civil War, maps etc?). I wouldn't make this a GA pass- fail issue, though. So what it amounts to is writing a proper lead, and dealing with the points previously posted in order to provide a more complete story. It may be necessary, where the details asked for are simply not available, to say things like: . I imagine, however, that at least some of the key missing details are available somewhere, and will be interested to see how the article develops.
Brianboulton (talk) 1. March 2. 00. 8 (UTC)I am trying to improve the article by addressing the GA review comments above. As I find and add things, they are added in italics after the appropriate comment. Everyone is welcome to help with this. Truthanado (talk) 0. April 2. 00. 8 (UTC)Dodge- y age.
Then later on, it says 1. Clarityfiend (talk) 1.
February 2. 01. 3 (UTC)External links modified. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple Fa. Q for additional information. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at .
If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting . Please include details about your problem, to help other editors. Cheers.—Internet. Archive. Bot(Report bug) 0. December 2. 01. 6 (UTC).